DJ photography and learning when to use a flash
I got lucky and scored some consistent work taking photos of DJs for a competition here in Christchurch. I'll probably talk about the finals in a separate post, but here I'll discuss my first two sessions with them. Spoiler alert: the client preferred the images in the first session, while I preferred the images in the second.

DIG THE DROp Heat 2
For Heat 2, I had my RF 45mm f/1.2 and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 IS Mk I on my R6 II. 70% of the final shots were out of the 45mm, as it lets in about 5.4 times as much light. It was a serious challenge getting well-lit shots at this venue! The lights were high and dim, with only one strobe light that pointed directly at the DJ. I think I ended up taking about 4,000 photos just to try to get something good. In the end, I was satisfied with what I got, and I made it work, but I had to work hard for it.






I will say the music was incredible, and I had a blast just being there. I was quite happy with how well the R6 II was doing in low light. Some of the DJs were kind enough to be quite still so I could have a lower shutter speed and more light, while others never stopped jumping around, which made it quite challenging. All I could think that night was, “Man, I wish I owned a flash!”





DIG THE DROp Heat 3
So I got a flash, the EL-5 specifically. I also rented the EF 16-35mm f/2.8 for this one so I could have just one lens on my camera and capture better crowd shots. I much preferred having properly exposed shots, and I think the colours in this set felt way more natural. I also got great energy from the crowd. I definitely blasted the flash way too much, and while nobody complained, I could see when people posted videos online that the flash just never stopped going off.









The 16-35mm was also a completely different experience to shoot with. I’ve never had such a wide-angle lens, and I had a great time actually getting up close and getting creative with it. It’s definitely not my style of photography. I much prefer tight, up-close portraits that capture the essence of a person, rather than the vibe of a place. It’s still very handy for my kit, though, and I’ll have to buy myself one in the future, either a standard zoom or a wide-angle zoom.









The crowd was also much smaller for this one, so I’m looking forward to the finals, where I’m expecting significantly more people. Still good fun, though. I even had some friends join in for a boogie.









The client hasn’t provided a reason as to why the first shoot looked better to them, but if I had to guess, it would be because they were more “art” focused than “coverage” focused. I was trying to capture candid shots of individuals in their element, rather than just covering the fact that the event happened with bright flashes of light that people came to expect.








So for the finals, I’ll be bringing my 45mm f/1.2 and using the flash sparingly, so I can strike a good balance and deliver the best collection of the three.

